Registration of a Company of Foreign Interests in Cyprus and employment of third country nationals


Author: Maria Rousia, Associate Lawyer at Dionysiou & Partners LLC (Cyprus)
Introduction
Although generally a Cyprus company must give priority in employment recruitment to Cypriots and EU nationals before attempting to employ third country nationals, there is an exception enabling companies of foreign interests to give priority to the employment of third country nationals instead of locals and EU nationals, provided that certain requirements are met.
The main aim of the above exception was the attraction of foreign investments. The criteria that companies must meet in order to benefit from this decision, the categories of staff and the maximum numbers of third country nationals who can be employed in each category of staff are described below.
Eligible Companies
The company must be a private company and third country shareholders should own the majority of the company’s shares (percentage equal or more than 50% of the total share capital). It is important to note that a company is considered eligible even if the majority shareholder is not considered as third country national provided that he/she acquired the Cyprus citizenship through the Cyprus Investment Program.
Also, there must be a foreign direct investment of capital amounting to at least €171.000.
In case where the percentage of foreign participation in the company’s share capital is equal to or less than 50% of the total share capital, in order for the company to be considered as suitable, the foreign participation should represent an amount equal to or greater than the amount of €171.000.
In the case where other legal entities are the shareholders, the whole chain of ownership up to the ultimate beneficial owners (hereinafter the “UBOs”) should be declared and documented. In this case, the criteria listed above apply also to them.
Finally, the company must operate in independent offices in Cyprus.
Staff Categories
A company is entitled to employ third country nationals in the following categories, provided that they first obtain temporary residence and employment permits.
A. Directors/Senior Managers
The maximum number of third country employees for this category is five persons, unless the Civil Registry and Migration Department (hereinafter the “CRMD”) is satisfied that the employment of a greater number is justified, depending on the circumstances of each company.
The minimum acceptable gross monthly salary is €3.872.
Directors or partners, general managers of branches and of mother companies of alien companies and managers of departments are included in this category.
B. Middle management executives and other key personnel
The maximum number of third country employees for this category is ten persons, unless the CRMD is satisfied that the employment of a greater number is justified, depending on the circumstances of each company.
The acceptable gross monthly salary is between €1936 – €3871.
Upper/middle management personnel, other administrative, secretarial or technical staff are included in this category.
C. Support staff
There is no maximum number for the employment of third country nationals under this category, provided that the necessary approvals from the Department of Labour have been obtained. 
The third country nationals that are not included in the above categories are included in this category.
Companies are expected to fill in positions in this category with Cypriots or EU nationals but in the case where there are no such qualified persons available, a company may employ third country nationals in posts in this category by following a specific procedure.
Employment of a greater number of third-country nationals in Companies of foreign interests
In order to convince the competent authorities that a greater number of third country employees need to be employed in the Company of Foreign Interests, there are 2 different procedures that can be followed depending on the volume of the additional third-country employees that the company is willing to employ:
a. The first procedure is followed when the company is willing to employ a small number of additional third country national employees (e.g. 1-3) through the submission of an official letter to the CRMD whereby specific additional information will be provided.
b. The second procedure is followed when the company is willing to employ more than three additional third country national employees and it is done through the Ministry of Interior. The CRMD cannot give its consent for the employment of more than 3 additional third-country employees and this can only be done by the Ministry of Interior.
Our office is familiar with these procedures and able to advise on these specific matters.
Conditions for third country nationals
A third country national must meet specific requirements set by the Cyprus legislation relating to their employment in the Republic. Our office can provide detailed lists of the required documents along with explanations for each requirement for the avoidance of any possible misunderstanding.
Validity of Temporary Residence and Employment Permit
Where all conditions in the law are met, the third country nationals are granted a temporary residence and employment permit. The validity of the permits depends on the duration of the employment contracts and can be up to two years, with a right of renewal.
Family Members
The first two categories of third country national employees (i.e. Directors and Middle management executives or other key personnel) have the right to apply for family reunification, meaning that third country nationals who are family members (spouse and minor children) can enter and reside in Cyprus after the employee/sponsor has followed the procedure for family reunification.
How Dionysiou & Partners LLC can assist:
Our experienced professionals can assist with the preparation, collection and submission of all required documents for the registration of the company with the Cyprus Registrar of Companies and then with its registration with the CRMD as a Company of Foreign Interests. We can also provide assistance in drafting of employment and rental contracts and obtaining the appropriate permits for third-country national employees and their family members.
Further to the above, we can assist with the opening of bank accounts not only for the company but also for the employees and we can proceed with the relevant registrations with the Tax Authorities and Social Insurance Services.
It is worth noting that we do not only undertake to submit all applications to the relevant departments, but we are in constant contact with the Cyprus authorities in order to avoid any delays and ensure that we will have the expected outcomes as swiftly as possible.
Our office undertakes the entire process from start to finish at reasonable prices. Please feel free to contact Dionysiou & Partners LLC at info@dplawcyprus.com to discuss how we can be of assistance to you.


Comments

Post a Comment

Editorial

Editorial
George Kazoleas, Lawyer

Top Stories

Ombudsman inquiry on Commission President’s text messages is a wake-up call for EU

Image
The European Ombudsman inquiry into the Commission’s handling of a request for text messages between its President and the CEO of a pharmaceutical company is a wake-up call for all EU institutions about ensuring accountability in an era of instant messaging. One year after the initial request by a journalist, the Commission has still not clarified whether messages reported to concern major vaccine procurement deals exist and whether the public is entitled to see them. The Ombudsman had asked the Commission, in a finding of maladministration in January, to conduct a more thorough search for the text messages. The Commission’s recent response failed to say whether it had looked directly and correctly for the text messages and if not, why not. While the response recognised that work-related text messages can be EU documents, it reiterated that the Commission’s internal policy is, in effect, not to register text messages. The Ombudsman has closed  the inquiry  and upheld...
Read more

Daily Mail publisher wins case against ‘success fees’ paid to lawyers (ECtHR)

Image
Obligation on publisher of the Daily Mail to pay substantial “success fees" in defamation and breach of privacy cases was excessive. The case Associated Newspapers Limited v. the United Kingdom (application no. 37398/21) concerned the fact that Associated Newspapers Limited the publisher of the Daily Mail and the Mail on Sunday had been obliged to pay extensive costs incurred by claimants who had successfully sued it in privacy and/or defamation proceedings following articles it had published in print or online in 2017 and 2019.  Since one of the claimants had entered into a conditional fee arrangement (CFA) with his legal representative, and both had taken out “after-the-event” (ATE) insurance, Associated Newspapers Limited had been liable not only for their base costs, but also for fee uplifts including the “success fee” in the CFA and for their ATE insurance premiums.  In Chamber judgment (12.11.2024) in the case, the European Court of Human Rights held, unanimously, that t...
Read more

ECtHR elects a new Vice-President of the Court and two new Section Presidents

Image
The European Court of Human Rights has elected on 23.9.2024 a new Vice-President of the Court – Judge Ivana Jelić (elected in respect of Montenegro). She will take up her duties on 1 November 2024.  The Court has also elected at the same date two new Section Presidents – Judges Lado Chanturia (elected in respect of Georgia) and Ioannis Ktistakis (elected in respect of Greece). They will also take up their duties on 1 November 2024. Ivana Jelić was born on 17 March 1975 in Podgorica, Montenegro and was elected Judge of the European Court of Human Rights on 12 July 2018. Lado Chanturia was born on 14 April 1963 in Tsalenjikha, Georgia, was elected Judge of the European Court of Human Rights on 8 January 2018 and is Vice-President of Section since 18 May 2023. Ioannis Ktistakis was born on 3 January 1971 in Thebes, Greece and was elected Judge of the European Court of Human Rights on 8 March 2021. (source/photo: echr.coe.int) Read more here
Read more

Intellectual property: the figurative sign consisting of the phrase ‘RUSSIAN WARSHIP, GO F* *K yourself’ in Russian and English cannot be registered as an EU trade mark

Image
In its Judgment in Case T-82/24 (Administration of the State Border Guard Service of Ukraine v EUIPO) (RUSSIAN WARSHIP, GO F**K YOURSELF) the General Court ruled that the figurative sign consisting of the phrase ‘RUSSIAN WARSHIP, GO F* *K yourself’ in Russian and English cannot be registered as an EU trade mark. That phrase, which has become a symbol of Ukraine’s fight against Russian aggression, is not perceived as an indication of a commercial origin.  The Administration of the State Border Guard Service of Ukraine (Kyiv, Ukraine) requests the General Court of the European Union to annul the decision of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 1 st December 2023, which refused registration of the following figurative sign as an EU trade mark: ‘RUSSIAN WARSHIP, GO F* *K yourself’ That mark is a war cry uttered by the Ukrainian border guard on Snake Island on 24th February 2022, the first day of the full-scale Russian invasion of Ukraine. Registration was sou...
Read more

The banks Crédit agricole and Credit Suisse participated in a cartel in the sector for suprasovereign bonds, sovereign bonds and public agency bonds denominated in US dollars

Image
According to the Judgment of the General Court in Cases T-386/21 (Crédit agricole and Crédit agricole Corporate and Investment Bank v Commission) and T-406/21 (UBS Group and Credit Suisse Securities (Europe) v Commission), the banks Crédit agricole and Credit Suisse participated in a cartel in the sector for suprasovereign bonds, sovereign bonds and public agency bonds denominated in US dollars (‘SSA Bonds’).  The General Court of the European Union confirms the Commission’s finding of an infringement and maintains the amount of the fines imposed in 2021. In 2018, the European Commission initiated proceedings for infringement of the competition rules involving Deutsche Bank, Bank of America, Crédit agricole and Credit Suisse (now UBS Group [1] ).  In 2021, the Commission found that those banks had entered into an agreement on the secondary market for suprasovereign, sovereign and agency bonds denominated in dollars (SSA bonds). According to the Commission, traders employed by ...
Read more

European Ombudsman asks Commission to publish details of its handling of senior staff move to law firm

Image
The European Ombudsman has asked the European Commission to publish details about how it has handled the planned move by a former director in its competition department to the Brussels office of a US corporate law firm as a partner. Any restrictions that have been placed on the activities of the former director to mitigate potential conflicts of interest should be made public without delay, said the Ombudsman. She noted that public information about the move came from the law firm and gives the impression that the Commission has allowed a senior official to work for a company that anticipates major benefits from their inside knowledge.  The Ombudsman also noted that the Commission declined to give details about the individual’s professional experience despite the fact that the law firm itself has put out a press release detailing it. The Ombudsman has previously criticised a tendency in the EU administration to underestimate the potential negative effects of staff moves to th...
Read more

A national court is not required to apply a decision of its constitutional court that infringes EU law (ECJ)

Image
In its Judgment of 26.9.2024 in Case C-792/22 (Energotehnica) the Court of Justice ruled as regards the right to an effective remedy that a national court is not required to apply a decision of its constitutional court that infringes EU law. In such a case, the national court may not be penalised.  Following the death of an electrician by electrocution during a maintenance operation, an administrative procedure was initiated against his employer. At the same time, criminal proceedings for negligence and manslaughter were initiated against the supervisor. The victim’s next of kin also became civil parties to the criminal proceedings.  The administrative court hearing the dispute concluded that the present case did not involve an ‘accident at work’. It annulled the administrative penalties imposed on the employer. According to national legislation, as interpreted by the Romanian Constitutional Court, that administrative decision prevents the criminal court from reconsidering whe...
Read more