MiCAR: The dawn of a Regulated Digital Era on Markets in Crypto-Assets

Written by Efi Thoma* 

A new Digital Finance Strategy is being implemented at EU level through Regulation (EU) 2023/1114 of 31 May 2023 on markets in crypto-assets (MiCAR), in consistency with the European Commission’s (Commission) agenda to shape Europe’s digital future, by promoting the blockchain technology, since crypto-assets are inextricably linked to the latter.

MiCAR will be directly and uniformly applicable in all Member States of the EU, having a binding legal effect, in December 2024, except for Titles III & IV which shall be applicable earlier, i.e. in June 2023. It establishes a bespoke and harmonised legal framework for crypto-assets issuers that seek to offer them across EU, as well as for crypto-asset service providers (CASPs) wishing to apply for an authorisation to provide their services in the EU single market.

According to the recitals of MiCAR, the definition of crypto-assets is interpreted “as widely as possible to capture all types of crypto-assets which currently fall outside the scope of European Union legislation on financial services”. NFTs and central bank digital currencies fall outside the scope of MiCAR.

What is the underlying rationale of this legal act?

The Commission following up on the innovative digital finance, made it its priority to deploy a robust legal and regulatory strategy by simultaneously embracing the undeniable digital revolution and protecting European consumers and businesses from any unnecessary risks. In the lack of any ad hoc European regulatory framework for crypto-assets, the European Banking Authority (EBA) and the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) had advised the Commission that the existing EU legislation on financial services was not covering crypto-assets in terms of consumer and investor protection and market integrity. These gaps on the EU legislation were being address by the legislators of each Member State at a national level. There was a dire need for a uniform EU approach on the subject matter in order to ensure that cryptocurrencies’ potential was being exploited to the fullest while at the same time their accompanying risks were being successfully mitigated (e.g. fraud, cyber-attacks, market manipulation).   

Under MiCAR, the EBA is entrusted with the task of supervising significant asset-referenced tokens (ARTs) and electronic money tokens (EMTs), pursuant to MiCAR’s pertinent clauses. The EBA shall implement technical standards and guidelines for the foregoing tokens falling under its supervision and shall work in collaboration with the Commission, ESMA, and the European Systemic Risk Board (ESRB). ESMA shall draw-up guidelines outlining the criteria upon which a decision shall be made on whether a crypto-asset should be considered a financial instrument under Markets in Financial Instruments Directive (MiFID) regulation versus MiCAR.

All EU Member states shall pass respective national laws to incorporate the provisions and requirements of MiCAR into national legislation. In parallel, national supervisory authorities will be mandated to exercise the discretionary powers given by MiCAR, including inter alia, the suspension or prohibition of crypto-asset offers, the prevention of unlawful activities by referring the issues for criminal investigation. The national supervisory authorities may also impose administrative sanctions to supervised entities of at least twice the amount of the profits gained or losses avoided or administrative sanctions of up to 12,5% of the total annual turnover, or even revoke their authorisation.

It is worth mentioning that the UK and the US follow a different legal path towards crypto assets. However, in the wake of the collapse of cryptocurrency exchange FTX in the US, a new bill has been introduced shifting the powers of the current regulatory authority towards a new competent supervisory authority.

* Qualified Lawyer, Member of Cyprus & Greece Bar Associations, holder of LL.B. from the Law School of Athens’ Kapodestrian University (Greece), LL.M. in Commercial Law (University of Glasgow, UK) and International Master in European Studies (Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels)

 (photo:gettyimages.com)

Comments

Post a Comment

Editorial

Editorial
George Kazoleas, Lawyer

Top Stories

Ombudsman inquiry on Commission President’s text messages is a wake-up call for EU

Image
The European Ombudsman inquiry into the Commission’s handling of a request for text messages between its President and the CEO of a pharmaceutical company is a wake-up call for all EU institutions about ensuring accountability in an era of instant messaging. One year after the initial request by a journalist, the Commission has still not clarified whether messages reported to concern major vaccine procurement deals exist and whether the public is entitled to see them. The Ombudsman had asked the Commission, in a finding of maladministration in January, to conduct a more thorough search for the text messages. The Commission’s recent response failed to say whether it had looked directly and correctly for the text messages and if not, why not. While the response recognised that work-related text messages can be EU documents, it reiterated that the Commission’s internal policy is, in effect, not to register text messages. The Ombudsman has closed  the inquiry  and upheld...
Read more

Daily Mail publisher wins case against ‘success fees’ paid to lawyers (ECtHR)

Image
Obligation on publisher of the Daily Mail to pay substantial “success fees" in defamation and breach of privacy cases was excessive. The case Associated Newspapers Limited v. the United Kingdom (application no. 37398/21) concerned the fact that Associated Newspapers Limited the publisher of the Daily Mail and the Mail on Sunday had been obliged to pay extensive costs incurred by claimants who had successfully sued it in privacy and/or defamation proceedings following articles it had published in print or online in 2017 and 2019.  Since one of the claimants had entered into a conditional fee arrangement (CFA) with his legal representative, and both had taken out “after-the-event” (ATE) insurance, Associated Newspapers Limited had been liable not only for their base costs, but also for fee uplifts including the “success fee” in the CFA and for their ATE insurance premiums.  In Chamber judgment (12.11.2024) in the case, the European Court of Human Rights held, unanimously, that t...
Read more

Intellectual property: the figurative sign consisting of the phrase ‘RUSSIAN WARSHIP, GO F* *K yourself’ in Russian and English cannot be registered as an EU trade mark

Image
In its Judgment in Case T-82/24 (Administration of the State Border Guard Service of Ukraine v EUIPO) (RUSSIAN WARSHIP, GO F**K YOURSELF) the General Court ruled that the figurative sign consisting of the phrase ‘RUSSIAN WARSHIP, GO F* *K yourself’ in Russian and English cannot be registered as an EU trade mark. That phrase, which has become a symbol of Ukraine’s fight against Russian aggression, is not perceived as an indication of a commercial origin.  The Administration of the State Border Guard Service of Ukraine (Kyiv, Ukraine) requests the General Court of the European Union to annul the decision of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 1 st December 2023, which refused registration of the following figurative sign as an EU trade mark: ‘RUSSIAN WARSHIP, GO F* *K yourself’ That mark is a war cry uttered by the Ukrainian border guard on Snake Island on 24th February 2022, the first day of the full-scale Russian invasion of Ukraine. Registration was sou...
Read more

ECtHR elects a new Vice-President of the Court and two new Section Presidents

Image
The European Court of Human Rights has elected on 23.9.2024 a new Vice-President of the Court – Judge Ivana Jelić (elected in respect of Montenegro). She will take up her duties on 1 November 2024.  The Court has also elected at the same date two new Section Presidents – Judges Lado Chanturia (elected in respect of Georgia) and Ioannis Ktistakis (elected in respect of Greece). They will also take up their duties on 1 November 2024. Ivana Jelić was born on 17 March 1975 in Podgorica, Montenegro and was elected Judge of the European Court of Human Rights on 12 July 2018. Lado Chanturia was born on 14 April 1963 in Tsalenjikha, Georgia, was elected Judge of the European Court of Human Rights on 8 January 2018 and is Vice-President of Section since 18 May 2023. Ioannis Ktistakis was born on 3 January 1971 in Thebes, Greece and was elected Judge of the European Court of Human Rights on 8 March 2021. (source/photo: echr.coe.int) Read more here
Read more

The banks Crédit agricole and Credit Suisse participated in a cartel in the sector for suprasovereign bonds, sovereign bonds and public agency bonds denominated in US dollars

Image
According to the Judgment of the General Court in Cases T-386/21 (Crédit agricole and Crédit agricole Corporate and Investment Bank v Commission) and T-406/21 (UBS Group and Credit Suisse Securities (Europe) v Commission), the banks Crédit agricole and Credit Suisse participated in a cartel in the sector for suprasovereign bonds, sovereign bonds and public agency bonds denominated in US dollars (‘SSA Bonds’).  The General Court of the European Union confirms the Commission’s finding of an infringement and maintains the amount of the fines imposed in 2021. In 2018, the European Commission initiated proceedings for infringement of the competition rules involving Deutsche Bank, Bank of America, Crédit agricole and Credit Suisse (now UBS Group [1] ).  In 2021, the Commission found that those banks had entered into an agreement on the secondary market for suprasovereign, sovereign and agency bonds denominated in dollars (SSA bonds). According to the Commission, traders employed by ...
Read more

European Ombudsman asks Commission to publish details of its handling of senior staff move to law firm

Image
The European Ombudsman has asked the European Commission to publish details about how it has handled the planned move by a former director in its competition department to the Brussels office of a US corporate law firm as a partner. Any restrictions that have been placed on the activities of the former director to mitigate potential conflicts of interest should be made public without delay, said the Ombudsman. She noted that public information about the move came from the law firm and gives the impression that the Commission has allowed a senior official to work for a company that anticipates major benefits from their inside knowledge.  The Ombudsman also noted that the Commission declined to give details about the individual’s professional experience despite the fact that the law firm itself has put out a press release detailing it. The Ombudsman has previously criticised a tendency in the EU administration to underestimate the potential negative effects of staff moves to th...
Read more

A national court is not required to apply a decision of its constitutional court that infringes EU law (ECJ)

Image
In its Judgment of 26.9.2024 in Case C-792/22 (Energotehnica) the Court of Justice ruled as regards the right to an effective remedy that a national court is not required to apply a decision of its constitutional court that infringes EU law. In such a case, the national court may not be penalised.  Following the death of an electrician by electrocution during a maintenance operation, an administrative procedure was initiated against his employer. At the same time, criminal proceedings for negligence and manslaughter were initiated against the supervisor. The victim’s next of kin also became civil parties to the criminal proceedings.  The administrative court hearing the dispute concluded that the present case did not involve an ‘accident at work’. It annulled the administrative penalties imposed on the employer. According to national legislation, as interpreted by the Romanian Constitutional Court, that administrative decision prevents the criminal court from reconsidering whe...
Read more