European Medicines Agency access to documents practices not in line with good administration, says European Ombudsman

The European Ombudsman has criticised two practices that the European Medicines Agency (EMA) applies when handling access to documents requests.

The first concerns EMA’s handling of certain requests for public access to documents by placing them in a chronological queue. In the Ombudsman’s view, this practice does not meet the requirement in the EU transparency regulation that the EU administration handle access requests promptly.

The second practice concerns EMA restricting individuals to a maximum of five requests in the chronological queue at a given time and limiting each of these requests to no more than two documents. This ‘5-2 rule’ is arbitrary and does not take account of the length, complexity, or total number of documents falling within the scope of individual requests. As a result, the Ombudsman found it to constitute maladministration.

The Ombudsman noted that EMA is already taking steps to phase out the chronological queue and asked the agency to report to her on its progress by 30 March 2024.

The Ombudsman’s findings emerged as part of an inquiry into public access to documents concerning a vaccine for infectious bovine rhinotracheitis. (source: ombudsman.europa.eu/photo: europa.eu)

Read more here

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Ombudsman inquiry on Commission President’s text messages is a wake-up call for EU

The Title Deed Issue in Cyprus and the "Trapped Buyers" Phenomenon

Greek Administrative Court rules state liable for Covid-19 vaccine side effects due to "excessive sacrifice"

European Commission refers Poland to the Court of Justice to protect judges from political control

Following the tragic death of lawyer Ebru Timtik, the CCBE calls on the EU and Turkish authorities to take urgent measures to prevent the death of lawyer Aytaç Ünsal

The Delivery Delay Clause in Residential Construction Contracts: Consumer Protection in Cyprus and Europe

Amendment of Articles of Association in Cyprus: Between Corporate Freedom and Abuse of Right – A Comparison with the Corresponding Regulation in Germany