European Medicines Agency access to documents practices not in line with good administration, says European Ombudsman

The European Ombudsman has criticised two practices that the European Medicines Agency (EMA) applies when handling access to documents requests.

The first concerns EMA’s handling of certain requests for public access to documents by placing them in a chronological queue. In the Ombudsman’s view, this practice does not meet the requirement in the EU transparency regulation that the EU administration handle access requests promptly.

The second practice concerns EMA restricting individuals to a maximum of five requests in the chronological queue at a given time and limiting each of these requests to no more than two documents. This ‘5-2 rule’ is arbitrary and does not take account of the length, complexity, or total number of documents falling within the scope of individual requests. As a result, the Ombudsman found it to constitute maladministration.

The Ombudsman noted that EMA is already taking steps to phase out the chronological queue and asked the agency to report to her on its progress by 30 March 2024.

The Ombudsman’s findings emerged as part of an inquiry into public access to documents concerning a vaccine for infectious bovine rhinotracheitis. (source: ombudsman.europa.eu/photo: europa.eu)

Read more here

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

A holding by purely financial investors in a law firm may be prohibited (CJEU)

Image
The EU Court of Justice ruled in Case C-295/23 (Halmer Rechtsanwaltsgesellschaft) that a holding by purely financial investors in a law firm may be prohibited. Such a prohibition is justified in order to ensure the independence of lawyers.  A Member State may prohibit holdings by purely financial investors in the capital of a law firm. Such a restriction on the freedom of establishment and the free movement of capital is justified by the objective of ensuring that lawyers can exercise their profession independently and in compliance with their professional conduct obligations.  The German law firm Halmer Rechtsanwaltsgesellschaft is challenging before the Higher Bavarian Lawyers’ Court (Germany) a decision of the Munich Bar Association of 9 November 2021 which revoked its registration with the bar association on account of the fact that an Austrian limited liability company acquired shares [1] in it for purely financial purposes. Under the German legislation applicable at the ...
Read more

Swiss franc loans and borrowers’ rights in the light of 4 important judgments of the European Court of Justice

Image
By George Kazoleas, Lawyer LL.M. The EU Court of Justice has issued important decisions in recent years on the issue of bank foreign currency loans, essentially in Swiss francs, which has created significant case law useful for defending the interests of borrowers who have been “trapped” by credit institutions in contracts with abusive currency risk clauses resulting in undue overchargings. In summing up this case-law, the European Court of Justice has reached the following main conclusions: 1.The loan agreement must set out in a transparent manner the exact functioning of the foreign currency conversion mechanism and the exchange rate clause so that the consumer can assess the financial consequences of this mechanism. 2.The borrower must be clearly informed by the bank that, by concluding a loan agreement in a foreign currency, he / she is exposed to a certain foreign exchange risk that he / she may find it difficult to cope with in the event of a devaluation of the currency a...
Read more

Alleged bullying of whistle-blowing prison guard - Violation of right to respect for private life (ECtHR)

Image
In its Chamber judgment in the case of Špadijer v. Montenegro (application no. 31549/18) the European Court of Human Rights held, unanimously, that there had been a violation of Article 8 (right to respect for private life) of the European Convention on Human Rights. The case concerned the alleged bullying of a prison guard following her reporting an incident involving male prison guards coming into the women’s prison where she worked and their inappropriate contact with female prisoners, and her attempts to address this with the authorities. The Court found in particular that the manner in which the legal mechanisms had been implemented in the applicant’s case had been inadequate, constituting a violation of the obligation on the State to protect her rights. Facts of the case The applicant, Daliborka Špadijer, is a Montenegrin national who was born in 1978 and lives in Podgorica. In 2013 Ms Špadijer, then head-of-shift prison guard in a women’s prison, reported five colleagues for an ...
Read more

MiCAR’s enforcement: An innovative crypto-friendly regulatory landscape

Image
 Written by Efi Thoma, Lawyer Does the highly anticipated rise of cryptos in the US under Trump administration align with MiCAR’s (Markets in Crypto-Assets EU Regulation) enforcement in the EU regulatory landscape? Even after the collapse of FTX illustrating the dire need for imposing strong regulations to protect investors in crypto assets, the current crypto regulatory progress in the U.S. is ambiguous and remains stalled. This outcome leads to the exacerbation of the lack of faith in the crypto ecosystem by highlighting the unaccountability of the crypto actors with regard to money laundering, financing of terrorism and other illegal activities. In 2023 the International Organization of Securities Commissions has laid out specific recommendations with the aim of imposing some global ground rules on the crypto and digital assets, given the global transactional activities on the crypto sector and the increasing need for the protection of investors in crypto assets. While the f...
Read more

The principle of the most favourable rule as a basic principle of Greek Labour Law

Image
By Evlampia Tsolaki, Attorney at Law* The principle of the most favourable rule (Günstigkeitsprinzip) constitutes a distinct characteristic of Greek labour law as it introduces a noteworthy exception to the strict pyramidal hierarchy that regulates by and large the relationship of the rules of law in the Greek legal order. Its application presupposes that two labour law legal sources of different legal nature and in any case of different origin co-exist and therefore demand to be implemented at the same time, given that they regulate the same issue, such as the days provided for a leave. On the condition, that an employment relationship falls within the ratione materiae, personae, temporis and loci of those both legal instruments and cumulatively both of its parties, namely the employer and employee, are bound by them, then the primacy will not be determined in accordance with the formal weight of each one, but pursuant to their substantive content according to the principle of the mos...
Read more

Greek Administrative Court rules state liable for Covid-19 vaccine side effects due to "excessive sacrifice"

Image
Greece: The Administrative Court of First Instance of Athens, in its decision no. 4202/2025, has ruled that the Greek State is liable for damages sustained by an individual due to side effects following a preventive "COVID-19" vaccination. This landmark decision was issued in a compensation lawsuit filed against the Hellenic Republic. The Case: Seeking Compensation for Vaccine-Related Harm The lawsuit was brought by a plaintiff seeking compensation for material damage and moral harm (non-pecuniary damage), alleging that they suffered severe side effects after their preventive COVID-19 vaccination with a specific vaccine. The initial claim was for €461,835.26, but this amount was subsequently restricted during the proceedings. The plaintiff based their claim on two legal grounds: Article 105 of the Introductory Law of the Civil Code (EισNAK): This article concerns the State's liability for compensation arising from illegal acts or omissions of its organs in the exe...
Read more

The Accused's Right to the Last Word in Cyprus Criminal Proceedings: A Critical Analysis

Image
 Written by George Kazoleas, Lawyer The right of the accused to speak last (the "Last Word Right") within criminal proceedings is a fundamental manifestation of the presumption of innocence and is enshrined in the criminal procedure systems of the vast majority of legal orders worldwide. The utility of this procedural rule is evident: it aims to achieve equality of arms by balancing the positions of the two parties – the prosecutor/complainant and the accused – before the court's final verdict. In Cypriot criminal procedure, a recent amendment sought to improve an anachronistic procedural provision that critically undermined the accused's right to defence. The Prior Legal Framework Before the amendment introduced by Law 130 of 2023, Article 74(2) of the Criminal Procedure Law stipulated the following: "In every trial, the prosecutor and the accused or their respective lawyers may introduce their case by explaining it in general terms, and at the end of th...
Read more