Status of long-term resident in Cyprus: Appeal against the rejection decision

By Giorgos Kazoleas, Lawyer in Cyprus

Third-country nationals residing in areas controlled by the Government of the Republic legally and continuously for the last five years prior to the submission of the application and holding a valid residence permit in the Republic can apply along with the required original documents in order to obtain the status of long-term resident in Cyprus.

It often happens that the Administration (in this case the Immigration Department) does not properly assess the facts and circumstances of the applicant and does not properly check the requirement for obtaining the status, resulting in a rejection decision.

This decision is notified to the applicant and must contain clear justification for the reasons for the rejection of the application. It must also state that the applicant has the right to appeal against the rejection decision within 75 days from the notification of the decision.

According to the Aliens and Immigration Law,[1]  in order to obtain the above-mentioned status, the following requirements must be met cumulatively-

(a) To have stable and regular financial resources, sufficient for the maintenance of himself and his dependent family members, without requiring recourse to the social welfare system of the Republic. For the assessment of these resources, the following shall be taken into account:

(i) income from gainful full-time employment;

(ii) income from other sources of a stable and legal nature;

(iii) the cost of living, including the amount of rent in the current market;

(iv) an employment contract valid for at least eighteen months or of an open-ended duration;

(v) the availability of accommodation for the applicant and/or for dependent family members, where applicable, which is considered satisfactory for a similar family in the same area, meets general safety and hygiene standards and generally ensures a decent standard of living.

(vi) in the event of an intention to be self-employed, the economic viability of the business or the relevant economic activity, including skills or experience in the relevant field of self-employment.

(a1) Have sufficient knowledge of the Greek language at level A2, as defined in the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages ​​of the Council of Europe, and basic elements of the contemporary political and social reality of Cyprus.

(b) Have health insurance that covers all risks, which are usually covered by insurance companies for Cypriot citizens.

(c) Do not constitute a threat to public order or public security within the meaning of article 18IA.

(d) His residence in the areas controlled by the government of the Republic has not been secured by fraud or false representations.

As it is expected, the reasons for rejection relate to the finding of the lack of one or more of the above requirements.

This article will discuss in more detail the first requirement (the availability of stable and regular financial resources), which is the most common reason for rejecting the application for long-term resident status.

The Directive 2003/109/EC of 25 November 2003 concerning the status of third-country nationals who are long-term residents, provides clear and secure guidance for the interpretation and methodology of the Administration's judgment in relation to the regular and sufficient financial resources that each Applicant must possess.

According to the above Directive, the main criterion for acquiring the status of long-term resident should be the duration of residence in the territory of a Member State. Residence should be both legal and continuous in order to show that the person has put down roots in the country. Provision should be made for a degree of flexibility so that account can be taken of circumstances in which a person might have to leave the territory on a temporary basis.

It is also important to note that, to acquire long-term resident status, third-country nationals should prove that they have adequate resources and sickness insurance, to avoid becoming a burden for the Member State. Member States, when making an assessment of the possession of stable and regular resources may take into account factors such as contributions to the pension system and fulfilment of tax obligations.

A guideline for the Administration when considering such an application is the Directive's statement that economic considerations should not be a ground for refusing to grant long-term resident status and shall not be considered as interfering with the relevant requirements.

The case law of the Cypriot Courts on the subject emphasizes the obligation to examine these criteria in good faith with respect for the purpose of the Directive.

As mentioned, the Administration, when assessing the requirements for granting the long-term resident status, is obliged to investigate in good faith all the relevant criteria and take into account all the data of each applicant in order to ensure its effective implementation with respect for the purpose of the Directive. The purpose is defined as the granting of a secure legal status to third-country nationals who are already long-term residents with rights as close as possible to those of citizens of the host Member State.[2]

In another decision, it is emphasized that the Law does not require a specific salary level, or an amount deposited in the bank. It is sufficient to have stable and regular financial resources, “sufficient” for the maintenance of the applicant. "Adequacy" is undoubtedly a function of the type of employment and the standard of living that the applicant is expected to have and maintain accordingly.[3]

Also, in a decision of the European Court of Justice, it has been held that for the calculation of the applicant's financial situation, resources originating from a third party or from a member of the applicant's family are not excluded, provided that they are stable, regular and sufficient. In this regard, the legally binding nature of the undertaking of a maintenance obligation by a third party or a member of the applicant's family may constitute an important element that must be taken into account. The competent authorities of the Member States may also take into account, inter alia, the family link between the applicant for long-term resident status and the family member or members who intend to undertake his maintenance. Similarly, the nature and permanence of the resources of the applicant's family member or members may be crucial elements in this regard.[4]

As the Immigration Department often fails to conduct a proper and sufficient examination of the applicant's financial information and rejects (often without legal or sufficient justification) the application, it is of great importance to file an appeal with the Administrative Court with a view to annulling the rejection decision, so that the Application can be properly re-assessed.

This article is for informational purposes only. For ad hoc advice and handling of your case, please contact the author at giorgos.kazoleas@gmail.com

Giorgos Kazoleas is qualified Lawyer in Cyprus and Greece , certified Mediator in Cyprus  in civil & commercial disputes and member of the Cyprus Bar Association and Greece Bar Association


[1] Article 18Θ of the Aliens and Immigration Law

[2] Case No. 1699/2011, March 13, 2013 (Supreme Court - Revisional Jurisdiction)

[3] Case No. 1877/2012, 22 December 2015,( Supreme Court, Revisional Jurisdiction)

[4] Judgment of the CJEU (Third Chamber) of 3 October 2019 X v Belgische Staat - Case C-302/18

(photo: freepik.com)

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Ombudsman inquiry on Commission President’s text messages is a wake-up call for EU

Image
The European Ombudsman inquiry into the Commission’s handling of a request for text messages between its President and the CEO of a pharmaceutical company is a wake-up call for all EU institutions about ensuring accountability in an era of instant messaging. One year after the initial request by a journalist, the Commission has still not clarified whether messages reported to concern major vaccine procurement deals exist and whether the public is entitled to see them. The Ombudsman had asked the Commission, in a finding of maladministration in January, to conduct a more thorough search for the text messages. The Commission’s recent response failed to say whether it had looked directly and correctly for the text messages and if not, why not. While the response recognised that work-related text messages can be EU documents, it reiterated that the Commission’s internal policy is, in effect, not to register text messages. The Ombudsman has closed  the inquiry  and upheld...
Read more

Prohibiting contact between children and their mother in custody and contact rights case was unjustified (ECtHR)

Image
The case of X and Others v. Slovenia (application nos. 27746/22 and 28291/22) concerned custody decisions and contact rights following the separation of X from her children’s father in 2018. It also concerned the reassignment of X’s court case to a particular judge.  In Chamber's judgment in the case, the European Court of Human Rights held, unanimously, that there had been a violation of Article 6 § 1 (right to a fair trial) of the European Convention on Human Rights, as regards X’s right to a tribunal established by law, and violations of Article 8 (right to respect for private and family life) with respect both to:  - the applicant children, as regards the order to remove them from X’s (their mother’s) care in March 2020, their not being represented in the contact and custody proceedings, and their not being allowed contact with their mother;  - X, for not being allowed contact with her children.  The Court found in particular that the President of the District Co...
Read more

Air passenger rights: A boarding pass may be sufficient to prove a confirmed reservation on a flight

Image
According to the Judgment of the European Court of Justice in Case C-20/24, a boarding pass may be sufficient to prove a confirmed reservation on a flight. Payment by a third party of the price of the package tour, including a flight, does not exclude the right to compensation in the event of long delay of a flight.  An air carrier offering charter flights concluded a contract with a tour operator. Under that contract, the carrier operated, on specific dates, flights for which that tour operator, after paying for the flights, sold tickets to air passengers. Two air passengers participated in a package tour, including a flight from Tenerife to Warsaw, the arrival of which was delayed by more than 22 hours. The contract relating to the package tour was concluded between a third company, on behalf of those passengers, and that tour operator. The passengers concerned claimed compensation from the air carrier under EU law. [1]  The latter refused to pay that compensation. It argued...
Read more

The Swiss authorities failed in their positive obligation to protect the life of a woman from violence by her partner (ECtHR)

Image
In the case of N.D. v. Switzerland, the European Court of Human Rights held that there had been a violation of the right to life in a case involving violence against a woman by her partner. The applicant, who had been unaware of her partner’s criminal record, was kidnapped by him from her home after informing him that she wished to end their relationship. She was then falsely imprisoned over an 11-hour period and subjected to rape and ill-treatment. To this day, the applicant suffers from the psychological after-effects of the treatment inflicted on her. The Court found that the authorities had not done all that could reasonably have been expected of them to avert the real and immediate risk to the applicant’s life, of which they had been or ought to have been aware. It noted that there had been neither an adequate assessment of the risk to the applicant’s life nor operational measures which might have had a real chance of altering the course of events or mitigating the da...
Read more

GDPR and transgender identity: the rectification of data relating to gender identity cannot be made conditional upon proof of surgery (CJEU)

Image
In its Judgment in Case C-247/23 |[Deldits] [1] the European Court of Justice ruled that the rectification of data relating to gender identity cannot be made conditional upon proof of surgery. In 2014, VP, an Iranian national, obtained refugee status in Hungary by relying on their transgender identity and producing medical certificates drawn up by specialists in psychiatry and gynaecology.  According to those certificates, although that person was born female, their gender identity was male. Following the recognition of their refugee status on that basis, that person was nevertheless registered as female in the asylum register, which is kept by the Hungarian asylum authority and contains identification data, including gender, of the persons who have obtained that status in Hungary.  In 2022, on the basis of the abovementioned medical certificates, VP requested, inter alia, that the asylum authority rectify the entry in respect of their gender in that register, on the basis of ...
Read more