Seeking justice in multi-jurisdictional fraud, creditors must be prepared for the long haul


By Chris Iacovides and Andri Antoniou- joint Liquidators*
According to a press release issued by the Cypriot police, on 31st January 2020, a 42-year-old Ukrainian national had been arrested in Budapest pursuant to a European arrest warrant, extradited to Cyprus and remanded in custody, in connection with financial fraud totaling $92m, orchestrated through Cypriot-registered companies. The individual arrested was the CFO of Mriya Agro Holding Public Ltd (“Mriya”), the Cypriot holding company of what was once one of Ukraine’s largest agricultural groups. Others wanted in connection with this matter are in hiding in Switzerland, where the authorities are known to be slow in executing international arrest warrants.
This is the outcome of a lengthy investigation by the Cypriot police following a criminal complaint made by the Liquidators of Mriya 4 years ago and vindicates what has recently been identified in a report of the Council of Europe’s anti money laundering body, Moneyval, published in December 2019, where it was identified that Cypriot authorities must be “more aggressive in pursuing money laundering from criminal proceeds generated outside Cyprus”.
The fact that it has taken the Cypriot Economic Crime Unit 4 years before arrest warrants were finally issued, will, undoubtedly, have rubbed salt into the wounds of creditors that suffered hundreds of millions in losses and have not seen any repercussions, so far, being suffered by those responsible, leaving the perpetrators feeling they are invincible.
Unravelling sophisticated international fraud committed through complex corporate structures, is extremely costly and time consuming and often, the architects of such schemes, “bank” on their victims not having the appetite and the perseverance, to unravel the fraud, not to mention the deep pockets required to do so. Recognition of liquidators’ draconian powers across international borders, when investigating fraudulent schemes is invaluable, but when faced with complex multi-jurisdictional fraud an efficient and speedy response on the part of the authorities is also key in the fight against money laundering and fraud.
Unfortunately, for those that masterminded the demise of Mriya, which collapsed with over $1 billion in debt, the Liquidators are determined to see this through to the end; several legal actions have been instigated in Cyprus and abroad, including successful applications for disclosure and freezing injunctions, recognition of their appointment in Switzerland, to mention a few.
Having discovered the existence of a luxury villa in Munich, the ownership of which was linked to the fraudsters, the Liquidators expeditiously obtained a freezing injunction over the property before also securing a worldwide freezing order against a number of those who looted Mriya’s assets. The freezing order was recognised and enforced with the German Land Registry blocking the transfer of the villa, which was being marketed for sale at $12m and was purportedly sold on the date the freezing order was granted, for $8.6m.
Getting to this stage has been no mean feat, it has been extremely costly, liquidators are often not in a position to cover such costs, fortunately, in this matter, with support of the creditors and their professional advisors[1] as well as our lawyers, we were able to do so.  
However, had the police had the resources and capacity to investigate such matters expeditiously, prosecute those responsible quickly, and confiscate their assets, this would undoubtedly lead to a change in attitude in those seeking to launder proceeds of crime through Cypriot entities. This was also highlighted in the Moneyval report, which identified that “the competent authorities have not been very proactive at freezing and confiscating foreign criminal proceeds at their own initiative” and that “if cases are taking a long time to come to court, this could have a detrimental effect on the effective management of frozen assets”.
We know the perpetrators behind the Mriya fraud have assets in other jurisdictions, however the cost to the liquidation, of freezing those assets, precludes us from doing so. This case is a classic example of why it’s crucial for the authorities to take swift action. If by now, confiscation and/or freezing orders had been obtained by the police, this would also have removed hurdles the liquidators have had to overcome and find ways to fund.
Nevertheless, the progress made so far, and the recent arrest will give a warning to those involved in Mriya and others, that despite the obstacles faced, with persistence and patience on the part of all stakeholders, the perpetrators may just be brought to justice[2].
*Chris Iacovides is a Certified Public Accountant and a Licensed Insolvency Practitioner, Andri Antoniou is a solicitor (non practising), Member of the Law Society of England and Wales and a Licensed Insolvency Practitioner - both Directors of CRI Group www.crigroup.com.cy which specialises in all aspects of corporate and personal insolvency.  


[1] Rothschild, Hogan Lovells, Dentons and L Papaphilippou & Co. LLC  
[2] Further information in respect of the Mriya case and the actions of the Liquidators can be found in Creditors’ Reports at www.crigroup.com.cy/articles-publications/articles-reports/

Comments

Post a Comment

Editorial

Editorial
George Kazoleas, Lawyer

Top Stories

Ombudsman inquiry on Commission President’s text messages is a wake-up call for EU

Image
The European Ombudsman inquiry into the Commission’s handling of a request for text messages between its President and the CEO of a pharmaceutical company is a wake-up call for all EU institutions about ensuring accountability in an era of instant messaging. One year after the initial request by a journalist, the Commission has still not clarified whether messages reported to concern major vaccine procurement deals exist and whether the public is entitled to see them. The Ombudsman had asked the Commission, in a finding of maladministration in January, to conduct a more thorough search for the text messages. The Commission’s recent response failed to say whether it had looked directly and correctly for the text messages and if not, why not. While the response recognised that work-related text messages can be EU documents, it reiterated that the Commission’s internal policy is, in effect, not to register text messages. The Ombudsman has closed  the inquiry  and upheld...
Read more

Daily Mail publisher wins case against ‘success fees’ paid to lawyers (ECtHR)

Image
Obligation on publisher of the Daily Mail to pay substantial “success fees" in defamation and breach of privacy cases was excessive. The case Associated Newspapers Limited v. the United Kingdom (application no. 37398/21) concerned the fact that Associated Newspapers Limited the publisher of the Daily Mail and the Mail on Sunday had been obliged to pay extensive costs incurred by claimants who had successfully sued it in privacy and/or defamation proceedings following articles it had published in print or online in 2017 and 2019.  Since one of the claimants had entered into a conditional fee arrangement (CFA) with his legal representative, and both had taken out “after-the-event” (ATE) insurance, Associated Newspapers Limited had been liable not only for their base costs, but also for fee uplifts including the “success fee” in the CFA and for their ATE insurance premiums.  In Chamber judgment (12.11.2024) in the case, the European Court of Human Rights held, unanimously, that t...
Read more

ECtHR elects a new Vice-President of the Court and two new Section Presidents

Image
The European Court of Human Rights has elected on 23.9.2024 a new Vice-President of the Court – Judge Ivana Jelić (elected in respect of Montenegro). She will take up her duties on 1 November 2024.  The Court has also elected at the same date two new Section Presidents – Judges Lado Chanturia (elected in respect of Georgia) and Ioannis Ktistakis (elected in respect of Greece). They will also take up their duties on 1 November 2024. Ivana Jelić was born on 17 March 1975 in Podgorica, Montenegro and was elected Judge of the European Court of Human Rights on 12 July 2018. Lado Chanturia was born on 14 April 1963 in Tsalenjikha, Georgia, was elected Judge of the European Court of Human Rights on 8 January 2018 and is Vice-President of Section since 18 May 2023. Ioannis Ktistakis was born on 3 January 1971 in Thebes, Greece and was elected Judge of the European Court of Human Rights on 8 March 2021. (source/photo: echr.coe.int) Read more here
Read more

Intellectual property: the figurative sign consisting of the phrase ‘RUSSIAN WARSHIP, GO F* *K yourself’ in Russian and English cannot be registered as an EU trade mark

Image
In its Judgment in Case T-82/24 (Administration of the State Border Guard Service of Ukraine v EUIPO) (RUSSIAN WARSHIP, GO F**K YOURSELF) the General Court ruled that the figurative sign consisting of the phrase ‘RUSSIAN WARSHIP, GO F* *K yourself’ in Russian and English cannot be registered as an EU trade mark. That phrase, which has become a symbol of Ukraine’s fight against Russian aggression, is not perceived as an indication of a commercial origin.  The Administration of the State Border Guard Service of Ukraine (Kyiv, Ukraine) requests the General Court of the European Union to annul the decision of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 1 st December 2023, which refused registration of the following figurative sign as an EU trade mark: ‘RUSSIAN WARSHIP, GO F* *K yourself’ That mark is a war cry uttered by the Ukrainian border guard on Snake Island on 24th February 2022, the first day of the full-scale Russian invasion of Ukraine. Registration was sou...
Read more

The banks Crédit agricole and Credit Suisse participated in a cartel in the sector for suprasovereign bonds, sovereign bonds and public agency bonds denominated in US dollars

Image
According to the Judgment of the General Court in Cases T-386/21 (Crédit agricole and Crédit agricole Corporate and Investment Bank v Commission) and T-406/21 (UBS Group and Credit Suisse Securities (Europe) v Commission), the banks Crédit agricole and Credit Suisse participated in a cartel in the sector for suprasovereign bonds, sovereign bonds and public agency bonds denominated in US dollars (‘SSA Bonds’).  The General Court of the European Union confirms the Commission’s finding of an infringement and maintains the amount of the fines imposed in 2021. In 2018, the European Commission initiated proceedings for infringement of the competition rules involving Deutsche Bank, Bank of America, Crédit agricole and Credit Suisse (now UBS Group [1] ).  In 2021, the Commission found that those banks had entered into an agreement on the secondary market for suprasovereign, sovereign and agency bonds denominated in dollars (SSA bonds). According to the Commission, traders employed by ...
Read more

European Ombudsman asks Commission to publish details of its handling of senior staff move to law firm

Image
The European Ombudsman has asked the European Commission to publish details about how it has handled the planned move by a former director in its competition department to the Brussels office of a US corporate law firm as a partner. Any restrictions that have been placed on the activities of the former director to mitigate potential conflicts of interest should be made public without delay, said the Ombudsman. She noted that public information about the move came from the law firm and gives the impression that the Commission has allowed a senior official to work for a company that anticipates major benefits from their inside knowledge.  The Ombudsman also noted that the Commission declined to give details about the individual’s professional experience despite the fact that the law firm itself has put out a press release detailing it. The Ombudsman has previously criticised a tendency in the EU administration to underestimate the potential negative effects of staff moves to th...
Read more

A national court is not required to apply a decision of its constitutional court that infringes EU law (ECJ)

Image
In its Judgment of 26.9.2024 in Case C-792/22 (Energotehnica) the Court of Justice ruled as regards the right to an effective remedy that a national court is not required to apply a decision of its constitutional court that infringes EU law. In such a case, the national court may not be penalised.  Following the death of an electrician by electrocution during a maintenance operation, an administrative procedure was initiated against his employer. At the same time, criminal proceedings for negligence and manslaughter were initiated against the supervisor. The victim’s next of kin also became civil parties to the criminal proceedings.  The administrative court hearing the dispute concluded that the present case did not involve an ‘accident at work’. It annulled the administrative penalties imposed on the employer. According to national legislation, as interpreted by the Romanian Constitutional Court, that administrative decision prevents the criminal court from reconsidering whe...
Read more